Thursday, November 30, 2006
Another perspective on that NYT article
San Francisco Chronicle columnist Jon Carroll wrote an article yesterday about the same New York Times piece mentioned in my Nov. 28 blog entry.

Glassman looks up to Buffett and Gates: "They are going to make a much greater contribution by having made money and giving it away than most, almost all, scientists."

Well, no. If those underpaid scientists had not spent all that ill-compensated time peering into microscopes and nosing around African swamps and setting up clinics and creating the medicines that will help mitigate human suffering, then the fortunes of American billionaires would have little to purchase. Of course, some scientists work their entire lives on projects that go nowhere, but by pursuing an unpromising line of inquiry, they have allowed others to follow other, more fruitful paths.

posted by 125records @ 1:49 PM  
1 Comments:
  • At 2:40 PM, Blogger Buck said…

    "Giving it away"? How about "paying back" instead? Gates and Buffet didn't make their billions in a vacuum. They made it in a society made up of OTHER PEOPLE and to return a small portion of their billions is not only a nice gesture on their part, but enables that society to continue to thrive and provide the means for them to continue to make more billions. To their credit, Gates/Buffet seem to understand this. Glassman... not so much.

     
Post a Comment
<< Home
 
About Me
Name: Sue
Home: San Francisco Bay Area, California, United States
About Me:
See my complete profile
Previous Post
Archives
Links
Powered by

BLOGGER